Flag and Symbol
Media & Artwork
Conferences, Congresses and Anniversaries
Leadership Structures
African Communist PDF Archive
African Communist Digital Archive
Bua Komanisi
Eastern Cape Bulletin
Umsebenzi Online
Umsebenzi Online Articles
Voice of the Proletariat - Northern Cape Publication
Feedback Form
Google Groups

Subscribe to

Umsebenzi Online

Alternatively visit this group.

Subscribe to

Communist University

Alternatively visit this group.

Contact us
Tel:  +27 11 3393621
Fax: +27 11 3394244
+27 11 3396880


PO Box 1027,
Johannesburg 2000,
South Africa

The latest Umsebenzi Click here to view the Latest Umsebenzi. [PDF]

The latest Umsebenzi Online

Why the assassin must not be granted parole
Read more

The latest African Communist Click here to view the Latest African Communist. [PDF]

Umsebenzi Online

  • Red Alert:

Latin America: Beginning of a new era?

By: Blade Nzimande, General Secretary

On Tuesday 10 January 2006 the SACP had the honour of meeting with President-elect of Bolivia, Cde Evo Morales. Cde Morales was on a brief visit to our country, as part of an international trip to several progressive countries, prior to his official inauguration on 22 January 2006.  The SACP used this opportunity to warmly congratulate Cde Morales for his historic victory in the Bolivian elections, and we expressed SACP solidarity with his movement, the Movement Towards Socialism (MAS), and the people of Bolivia as a whole.

We used the opportunity to discuss South Africa?s constitution-making process prior to the adoption of our new constitution in 1996, and perspectives on general political developments since then. Interestingly, we found we shared many common convictions with Cde Morales on the fundamentals of developing a progressive democratic constitution that will advance the interests of the overwhelming majority of the working people and the poor in our respective countries.

?You cannot win on the table what you have not won on the ground?

One fundamental agreement was the absolute necessity of convening a democratic constituent assembly that will be driven by the interests of the overwhelming majority of the people, rather than protecting the interests of elites. This concern is critical for both our countries sharing a legacy of denial of basic human and democratic rights for the overwhelming majority of our respective indigenous populations. In the case of Bolivia, 63% of the population is made up of indigenous Indian people, who, according to Morales, ?have never been treated as human beings with dignity, and have never been able to participate in the political and economic life of Bolivia as equal citizens?. Despite being a majority, indigenous Bolivians are still today virtually absent in all key economic and political centres of power.

In our discussions, another point of convergence on constitution-making was that revolutionary movements cannot win at the negotiating table what has not been won on the ground, thus emphasising the importance of progressive mass mobilisation as an essential component of the constitution-making process itself. Similarly, particularly when progressive forces are in government, it is possible to lose on the table what has been won on the ground, underlining the dangers of divorcing governance (or more specifically government) from ongoing mass mobilisation. A progressive constitution on paper without active popular participation in all aspects of life is a dead document. The first step towards decadent revolutions is the periodic mobilisation of the masses solely for elections, whilst effectively neglecting them between election periods.

The electoral victory of Cde Morales in Bolivia marks a welcome and continuing shift of Latin American politics towards the left. As we have argued before, this leftward shift also marks a powerful popular rejection of and challenge to capitalist neo-liberal policies. It is for this reason that the progressive developments in Latin America are not only significant for the Latin American people, but for the peoples of the developing world, whose rights and economic opportunities have been rolled back by neo-liberalism. These developments are therefore also of immense significance to South Africa, especially to all the progressive forces in this country, and they therefore require closer scrutiny.

Morales? victory has come in the wake of similar victories by Lula of Brazil, Chavez of Venezuela, and this week?s important victory of the socialist candidate Michelle Bachelet of Chile, the first woman president in that country. While the political parties, movements and programmes of these different leaders, and other left-leaning governments as in Uruguay, each have their own national specifics (and some are more left-leaning than others) ? all have been swept into power by powerful popular waves of anti-neoliberal mobilisation. Clearly the tide is turning in this part of the world, in favour of the workers and the poor.

An end to the era of US dominated, capitalist ?democratic transitions??
Obviously there are important differences between South Africa?s recent history and that of much of Latin America, but there are also some important parallels. Heightened popular mobilisation after World War 2 in both South Africa and many Latin America countries was crushed by authoritarian and (in Latin America) usually military regimes. There was widespread torture, disappearances, assassinations, and the targeting of Communist Parties, trade unions and guerrilla movements.

In the midst of the Cold War, US imperialism actively supported these reactionary forces, just as it supported white minority regimes in Southern Africa. In Chile, democratically-elected president Allende was overthrown and murdered in a military coup in 1973. Not unlike the strategic defeat of the ANC-led liberation movement in the mid-1960s, most of the traditional left in Latin America found itself badly destabilised in the decades of the 1960s and 70s.

Again, with many similarities with South Africa, in conditions of severe repression, the popular movement began to stir again in the 1970s and 80s ? often in the shape of social movement (?UDF?-type) activism - trade unions, civil rights groups, civic and student movements, progressive journalism, progressive faith-based formations influenced by liberation theology, etc. The trade union movement in Brazil, which went on to be the core formation for President Lula?s Workers? Party, emerged roughly at the same time as the re-emerging progressive trade union movement in South Africa.

In other Latin American countries, particularly among the least developed (like Nicaragua, El Salvador, Peru and Colombia) rural-based guerrilla struggles against US-backed authoritarian regimes proved to be more durable.

In the course of the 1980s and early 1990s, there was an important (if partial) shift in imperialist policy towards authoritarian regimes in such diverse places as South Africa, the Philippines, and key Latin American countries like Chile, Argentina and Brazil. These regimes were increasingly seen as a liability, and negotiated elite-pact transitions to ?democracy? were now encouraged by influential think-tanks in Washington. This shift was partly a pre-emptive response to popular challenges to authoritarian regimes. It was also partly because the diminished power and eventual collapse of the Soviet Union rendered unpopular, pro-imperialist regional gendarmes in Southern Africa or in Latin America less useful to imperialist purposes than previously.

As a result of a combination of factors military rule ended and there were elite pact transitions to multi-party ?democracy? in a number of key countries. However, where the guerrilla struggle proved to be victorious (Nicaragua) Washington?s policies continued to focus on active economic and military destabilisation ? the people were to be given ?democracy?, but if they voted ?wrongly?, they had to be given lessons.

In many key Latin America countries (including Chile, Brazil and Argentina) there were indeed transitions to civilian rule and some degree of liberal democracy in this period. Obviously, these democratisation processes were generally welcomed. However, with few exceptions, the new civilian governments used their electoral ?mandate? to push through harsh neo-liberal social and economic policies ? macro-economic stabilisation at the expense of popular classes, whole-sale privatisation, etc. The brutality of the torture room was replaced by the faceless brutality of the market.

In Washington in the 1980s and 1990s the ?democratic transitions? in Latin America, Eastern Europe and South Africa were heralded as the ?third wave of democracy?, the fruits of a new post-Cold War globalisation. What we are now witnessing, at least in many parts of Latin America, is the popular rejection of this ?third wave?. Just as in South Africa, so throughout South America people are asserting that democracy is not just periodic elections and formal constitutional rights (as important as they are), democracy must also involve social and economic justice if it is to have any real meaning for the majority.

The working class taking direct charge of, and responsibility for, advancing the national democratic revolution

Perhaps what marks the possibilities of a new era in Latin America is that the workers and the poor, principally through mass movements, have made it possible to more directly take charge of democratic revolutions without class mediation from the petty bourgeoisie, or the ?patriotic? bourgeoisie. Also, more than in the previous two decades, popular revolutionary formations are beginning to master the electoral terrain as an important platform, in the current conjuncture, to advance revolutionary goals.

Of significance in some of the left advances in Latin America is a direct challenge to the otherwise dominant neo-liberal discourse of an ?end of history? and that ?there is no alternative? (TINA) to imperialist global policies. These advances are also challenging the familiar reformist arguments that ?we need to understand the bigger picture?, that popular mobilisation is ?populist?, ?ultra leftist? and ?adventurist?. These reformist positions are TINA with a bad conscience.

Another important lesson from the Latin American left advances, not least in Venezuela, is that of the necessity of ongoing popular participation and mass mobilisation, not only during election campaigns, but as a permanent feature of consolidating progressive revolutions. It must be mass mobilisation based on popular participation in the daily struggles around issues facing ordinary people. It must be mobilisation based on the ?lived experiences? of ordinary workers and the poor, not on some ?feel-good? opinion surveys, predominantly measuring the confidence or otherwise of the bourgeoisie and the middle classes. This was an appropriate lesson that Chavez taught the Venezuelan bourgeoisie and middle classes in last year?s referendum.

In our discussions with Morales we were heartened by his commitment to the re-nationalisation of the gas industry and other resources and assets of the Bolivian people. His electoral victory also rested on this long-standing demand, which led to the toppling  of three presidents within four years, by the mass movements and the trade union movement in Bolivia. Chavez in Venezuela is embarking on similar programmes whilst not entirely terminating partnerships with the private sector where necessary, but where such partnerships continue the objective is that they should be dominated by a state-led developmental agenda, and not the market.

Potential fault-line: political parties, mass movements and the state

As Marxist-Leninists, we should note, welcome and seek to build on the very important advances made by the Latin American people in fighting against neo-liberalism and seeking to build a new order, with and for the workers and the poor of those countries. In much of the recent advances it is also noticeable that mass movements (referred to as ?social movements? in Latin America) have played a crucial, and sometimes even determining, role in some of the recent electoral advances and victories.

We have noted above the important parallels between our own recent struggle history and that of many Latin American countries, particularly the re-emergence of popular struggle through the mass movement current often in a situation in which older political parties had been defeated. The South African organisation experience is, however, somewhat different from many key Latin America countries, in that through the 1970s and 80s, despite the fact that much of the leadership of the ANC and SACP were in prison or in a relatively distant exile, our historic formations (the ?old left?) succeeded in providing leadership and coherence to (while also learning from) the ?new? broad mass movement.

This was not generally the case in countries like Brazil or Uruguay or Bolivia. There are many reasons for this, both subjective and objective factors ? but the most important is, no doubt, the viciousness with which the United States backed the weakening and, where possible, annihilation of Communist parties and movements. No resources were spared in this crusade in what the US regards as its own back-yard, its own ?special sphere of interest?. Hence the obsessive viciousness of the campaign and blockade against Cuba, a country ruled by a Communist Party for close to five decades now.
However, the weaknesses of Communist Parties in many Latin American countries (and the same applies even more forcefully to much of Africa) can also be attributed to a tendency to become ?vanguardist?, sometimes dogmatic (which is often the direct result of operating in conditions of harsh repression), seeking to be parties of the working class in a purist manner, in a context where the broad working class, let alone its organised sections, is a tiny proportion of many Latin American populations.

Cde Morales, during our discussions, raised his concerns about what he saw as a very factionalist and vanguardist approach of the Bolivian Communist Party. In the case of Bolivia, Morales? electoral victory has been based essentially on mass movements principally combining labour, rural and indigenous movements. This raises a very fundamental question for the left. How sustainable is an electoral victory, like that of Morales, based as it is on the support of a mass movement without any cohesive revolutionary political party? This question is important, given the often fractious nature of mass movements. Oppositional struggles can often unite diverse social movements, but sustained electoral politics and especially the effective exercising of state power pose additional challenges. Chavez in Venezuela seems to have acknowledged the challenge and is engaging in a project to build a cohesive political movement of the workers and the poor.

To argue the need for left and especially communist parties in revolutionary struggles is not to be blind to the inherent danger of bureaucratisation of left political parties and liberation movements once in power. This was particularly the case in the Soviet socialist bloc in Eastern Europe and in the case of many of the former liberation movements in our Southern African region, where, once in power, the party or movement distances itself, and even develop a hostile attitude towards independent mass and trade union movements.

These are indeed very fundamental questions for any revolutionary movement. At the heart of revolutionary struggles is always the often fraught relationship between political parties, mass movements and the state. The route to consolidating left victories in Latin America, and indeed in our own situation, is a correct grasp of this relationship.
The strengths and weaknesses of the electoral terrain of struggle

A perennial question for revolutionary movements is that of the place of elections and representative democracy in advancing the revolutionary objectives of the workers and the poor. Electoral sites of struggle are very important in the contemporary period, but they are always subject to the unequal power relations in society. Electoral victories of the mass of the people are always susceptible to reversal by those who control wealth and the major ideological institutions in society.

In class societies there is also always the reality that the propertied classes have the capacity to subvert electoral gains, even in many instances through the co-option of the new elite. It is for this reason that electoral and representative democracy must always be buttressed by ongoing mass mobilisation. This is going to be an important test for the advances currently being made by the left in Latin America, and indeed in our own situation.

  *  *  *  *

The SACP congratulates Cde Morales on his forthcoming inauguration. We pledge our solidarity with his movement and government. 


SACP Congratulatory Message to the ANC on its 94th Anniversary Celebrations

The SACP wishes to warmly congratulate and salute the African National Congress on its 94th anniversary on January 8, 2006. The ANC?s history is truly a symbol and an embodiment of selfless struggle and dedication to the total liberation of the African people in particular and blacks in general from the yoke of national oppression and the building of a non-racial, non-sexist and democratic South Africa. The ANC?s proud tradition of struggle is a monument to the best that our people aspire to. The challenge there is we dare not fail our people in this regard.

As the SACP we are proud to have an ally like the African National Congress, whose leadership of our movement as a whole ensured the defeat of the apartheid regime and the building of a democratic South Africa. To us this is an occasion we need to use to celebrate and honour the finest traditions of our movement: dedication, hard work, selflessness and willingness to serve the people without expecting any personal favours or gains for its combatants. It is even more important to uphold these as exemplary values particularly in this period of rampant capitalist globalization and its neo-liberalism, which is threatening to submerge civilised human values of solidarity under imperatives of intensified class exploitation and personal accumulation. 

Celebrating 94 years of the existence of the ANC must also be about the achievements of the ANC and the government it leads has, through which millions of South Africans, especially the workers and the poor, have seen some improvements to their lives. As we move towards celebration of 12 years of our democracy, this January 8 is also an important moment to reflect and seek to strengthen the alliance that the ANC heads. Despite all the achievements over the past 11 years, there are still many challenges facing our country and our young democracy. These challenges require maximum unity of the movement as a whole, including its alliance and all other democratic and progressive forces.

The most immediate challenge facing our movement is that of the forthcoming local government elections in just under three months from now. These elections are important as they are about electing local representatives of the people, thus ensuring community participation in building a better life for all. It is partly for these reasons that the SACP has adopted a Programme of Action for 2006 under the slogan: ?Communist Cadres to the Front, For People-Centred Local Economic Development?.

The SACP has adopted this slogan and programme of action as part of its own contribution in mobilising for an overwhelming ANC victory in the forthcoming local government elections. We have adopted this programme of action also because we strongly believe that we should continuously mobilise our people during and after the elections in order to ensure that they drive the programme of delivery of basic services and transforming local conditions to create a better life for all. It is the masses themselves, with the working class in the lead, that are the architects of their own history and destiny.

The ANC, as a movement and ruling party, has a particular responsibility in leading mass campaigns and ongoing mobilisation of our people to transform their own conditions. This is the single biggest challenge facing our movement this year and beyond in order to ensure that our people remain mobilised at all times. In recent times not enough of this mobilisation has been done. Much, much more still needs to be done, during and outside election periods. For the SACP this is a call that we go back to the basics, to organise and mobilise. As the SACP we pledge our loyalty to such a task and partnership in the mobilisation of our people at local level.

The ANC has correctly adopted the principle of equal representation of men and women in all its structures as well as in candidates for the forthcoming local government elections. This is an important step towards ensuring that women take their rightful place in all of South African society. However the biggest challenge in this regard remains that of ensuring that equal representation places the transformation of gender relations at the centre of our struggles. Whilst this task is equally for both men and women, but it cannot be achieved if women are not mobilised as the leading force in the struggle for gender transformation. In addition we need to ensure that equal representation between women and men is driven by a mandate that prioritises the interests of ordinary working class and poor women, both in the urban and rural areas, through a sustained struggle for gender equality. We should not allow this important principle of equal representation for both men and women to be hijacked by elitist interests, serving only the interests of women who are already better off.

The SACP?s 2006 Programme of Action also aims to focus on a critical challenge facing our revolution, that of local economic development, creation of jobs and other forms of sustainable livelihoods. We believe that local government through integrated development plans has an important role to play in this regard. Our expectation as the SACP from ANC-led municipalities is promotion of local and community economic activities, including land and agrarian transformation, building of co-operatives as well as directing and guiding local investment for jobs and poverty eradication.

We are also confident that, reflecting from our past experiences, ANC candidate councillors will be of high calibre with dedication to serve our people without expecting any personal gain or favours. It is also our considered view as the SACP that we should separate the roles of public representatives and business interests. We need to foster a cadre and a culture of public service as a worthy objective in itself, if we are to rapidly meet the challenge of creating a better life for all our people. That is why we also say celebrating 94 years of the ANC should also be an occasion to celebrate and uphold its values of solidarity, selfless and dedicated service to our people.

All in our movement are agreed that 2005 provided one of the stiffest tests for the unity of our movement and the resilience of our democracy. These challenges, principally emanating from matters related to the Deputy President of the ANC, require that we seriously reflect on all these matters and honestly discuss and draw appropriate lessons. Our movement can only be strengthened if it does not shy away from an honest analysis of this experience, but instead reflect on all its dimensions and underlying causes, so that we are able to emerge as a united force, capable of taking forward the national democratic revolution. As the SACP we shall at all times strive to preserve the unity of our movement, whilst at the same time ensuring inner debates and discussions.

We take this opportunity to salute this giant, our ally, the African National Congress on this important occasion. We call upon all communists and all our people to partake in these celebrations, as part of cementing the unity of our alliance and building a strong, campaigning and activist ANC. It is our fervent belief that our movement and its alliance can only be strengthened through unity in action, through concrete campaigns and through ongoing mobilisation of our people.

The SACP on its part will contribute towards this unity in action through actively taking up alliance campaigns as well as its own campaigns. We must make that historic statement by the late Oliver Tambo a living reality that ours is not a paper alliance, but an alliance built through struggle.


Issued by:

SACP General Secretary Dr Blade Nzimande

For Information contact

Francis Maleka

Tel: 011 339-3621

Fax: 011 339-4244

Cell: 082 863 7595

Email: malesela@sacp.org.za


 SACP Statement on 2005 Matric Results   

The SACP wishes to congratulate all those who passed their Matric Exams in 2005. We should however congratulate the whole class of 2005 for the efforts they have put into their schooling and examinations.

The SACP also takes this opportunity to wish all those who are proceeding into institutions of Higher Education successful studies. We would also like to encourage those who have not passed not to loose hope but to explore all possible opportunities for further education and training.

The SACP welcomes some of the improvements in some areas of our Matric exam system. In particular we are encouraged by the increase in the number of candidates who have registered for Matric exams this year, as well as the increase in the number of candidates writing maths and science. This shows that we are on the right course.

We also wish to congratulate the national and provincial Departments of Education, umalusi, the educators, parents and learners for their efforts in ensuring relatively smooth Matric examinations.

We are however concerned about the two percent drop in the pass rate. The SACP is of the view that we have now perhaps stabilised around a pass rate of around 70 percent, and seemingly we can now only make improvements once we focus more attention on our primary schooling system. Research consistently shows that levels of numeracy and literacy at primary school level are very low, especially in the rural areas. Unless government intensifies its efforts in this regard, we are unlikely to see any significant higher pass rates in Matric in the coming years.

The SACP is also worried about the lack of adequate opportunities for further education and training for those candidates who do not get Matric exemptions, especially in the context of high unemployment in our country and low levels of job creation. The key challenge here is to rapidly expand the FET factor such that it is able to absorb more students. In particular we need to also significantly expand opportunities to train artisans, both in the public and private sectors.

We therefore call upon both the Departments of Education and Labour to speed up the review of the national qualifications framework, which is long overdue, and for these departments to actively co-operate in working towards a framework to increase absorption of school leavers. Our country needs more school exit routes in order to increase education and training opportunities for school leavers.

Issued by:

Blade Nzimande

General Secretary

For further inquiries please contact:

Kaizer Mohau

Media Liaison Officer

South African Communist Party (SACP)

Tel: 011 339 3621

Fax: 011 339 4244

Mobile: 076 573 7764

Email: kaizer@sacp.org.za

Web portal: www.sacp.org.za